Grass-roots group urges U.K. public to stop paying energy bills. Its campaign has drawn 100,000 supporters.

Itā€™s the summer of strikes in the U.K.

Following walkouts by rail workers, garbage collectors, bus drivers and junior barristers in recent months, the general public is now being encouraged by a grass roots campaign to protest soaring energy bills.

Donā€™t Pay U.K has called for consumers to cancel their automatic bank transfers on energy bills from Oct. 1 to force gas and electric providers to reduce the maximum amount they can charge customers annually.

The date coincides with an expected increase in the tariff price cap by U.K. energy regulator OFGEM, that consulting firm Cornwall Insight estimates will jump to Ā£3,582 ($4,208) from October and Ā£4,266 ($5,012) in January 2023. Cornwall says average monthly energy bills would soar 181% in just one year with that hike. In April, bills climbed from Ā£1,200 to the current cap of Ā£1,971.

The prospect of surging electricity prices prompted an eye-popping forecast from Citi analysts who say U.K inflation could reach as much as 19% next year.

But even providers such as Octopus Energy have said neither customers nor retailers should be carrying the cost of Russiaā€™s war in Ukraine, and have called for the government to double its support package.

To date, over 112,000 people have pledged to cancel their bills, though Donā€™t Pay U.K. has said the strike will only take place if one million people sign up.

Activists from the movement have told MarketWatch that they are confident more people will come on board, especially as OFGEM is expected to announce the official October cap on Friday.

Making the government ā€˜see senseā€™

CarbonBrief

Glyn Robbins, 57, a Donā€™t Pay grass roots activist, told MarketWatch that the campaign was set up to force the government, OFGEM and energy providers to ā€œsee senseā€ and reduce prices to a ā€œmore reasonable levelā€.

ā€œIf it went back to the level that was being talked about back in the spring, obviously we were aware of the broader issues in terms of Ukraine and so forth, I think that probably would be enough for most people,ā€ he said.

Robbins joined the movement almost two months ago when his partner found a Donā€™t Pay leaflet on the ground near their home in east London.

He said he was more concerned about those who cannot pay their bills, rather than those who donā€™t want to pay. ā€œWe already have about 8 million people classified as in fuel poverty in this country at the moment. Thatā€™s before this got worse and 2 million of them are old age pensioners.

ā€œIā€™m more concerned about what this means for the younger people, for poor people, older people or people with disabilities who have far less control over how they use energy. This is to me a line in the sand,ā€ said Robbins, who believes the movement could sweep the country as suffering will be widespread.

ā€œIā€™m not primarily doing it for myself. Iā€™m reasonably comfortable financially, but Iā€™ve got a granddaughter and Iā€™m concerned about her future,ā€ he said.

When asked if he was worried about possible consequences of supporters not paying the bills, such as energy providers taking legal action or cutting off supply, Robbins said, ā€œMost people are not doing this in a flippant, casual wayā€¦It might be that people pay what they can afford, and donā€™t pay the rest. Or they set up a payment arrangement line.ā€

Tyler Richey, co-editor at financial research firm, Sevens Report Research, told MarketWatch: ā€œIf one million households in the U.K. didnā€™t pay their utility bills, I have to assume the respective utility companies would eventually cut power to those homes and that would actually ease some of the demand pressures on the grid which is expected to be strained this winter given the very low flows from Russia to Europe.ā€

An effort in vain?

In a client note from RBC Capital Markets, a team of analysts led by John Musk said that British Gas owner Centrica
CNA,
-0.50%
has 60% of its customers on automatic payment who could potentially not pay, but that any ā€œbad-debt riskā€ would be temporary.

ā€œWe would then see any action from the movement adversely affecting the number of residential customers on direct debit schemes. Nevertheless, longer term we would see any nonpayment from residential customers as eligible for cost recoveries longer term and so we believe any bad-debt risk would be temporary.

ā€œWhat we would not expect to see however is lower energy costs for consumers as a result of this movement, with energy suppliers largely operating low margin pass-through businesses amid a period of significantly elevated underlying commodity costs,ā€ said Musk.

A spokesman from trade association Energy U.K. said suppliers anticipate lots of customers may fall into arrears this winter. ā€œWeā€™d always encourage any customers struggling with bills to contact their supplier and discuss alternative payment plans and consumer groups have warned customers against just canceling direct debits.

He added that he understood why concerns of rising bills have led to the campaignā€™s establishment, and maintained that the government must step in to increase its support for households come this fall.

ā€œFinal point, if significant numbers of customers arenā€™t paying their bills (for whatever reason) then that increases the amount of bad debt which then has to be recouped from all customersā€™ bills,ā€ said the spokesman.

Original Source Link